|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permaculture |
|
|
|
Permaculture
“permanent agriculture,” “permanent culture,” designing
and implementing sustainable systems, a holistic approach to land use, which
works with nature’s rhythms and patterns
|
|
|
|
The
STAR school students have learned much about the four elements of permaculture:
air, fire, water and earth, while working on their garden, the campus desert
landscape, and within their school greenhouse. Several subtopics of the
four elements were studied throughout the school year including the subject
of soil. |
|
|
|
|
|
First, the primary students
came up with a list of questions:
- How do plants survive
in the soil?
- What makes soil good
or bad?
- Is STAR School soil
dry?
- What temperature is
it?
- What are the different
types of soil?
- How does the soil
make the plants grow?
- What types of bugs
go in the soil?
- How do the plants
“eat” the soil?
These questions were then
researched
in different ways, beyond the four walls
of the classroom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
students conducted soil research on the STAR campus within the
landscape and gardens. They found the living soil to be fascinating. Students
such as Chanteal wanted to stay outside to conduct her own soil explorations
even after her cooperative group work was finished. While she examined the soil
sift between her fingers, she told Ms. Richards, “I love being outside!”
While the students worked on the xeriscape around the school campus, they developed
a new awareness of and respect for the land.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Evaluation of the Permaculture,
Gardening and Xeriscaping Work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: To what stage of development
does the work engage students in investigation,
inquiry, and problem solving?
A: The evidence that substantiates a Progressing level includes the following:
• The list of questions is evidence of student inquiry prior to investigation.
• The images show that the students investigated soil characteristics
such as soil temperature, soil types, living organisms within the soil, and
identifiable organic matter.
• The teacher’s narrative evidenced that children were engaged
in self-directed learning.
• This evidence also shows student interest and motivation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chanteal is busy studying
the living earth. |
|
|
|
|
Rubric
One: Student Learning and Contributions
Theme: Academic Rigor of the Project
|
QUESTION
|
Beginning:
Glimmer of a New Approach
|
Progressing
|
Progressing
|
Advanced/GOAL:
Transforming and Sustainable
|
| Does
the work engage students in investigation, inquiry, and problem solving? |
The project provides
one or two opportunities for students to engage in inquiry or investigation. |
The project provides
several opportunities for students to engage in inquiry or investigation. |
The project provides
numerous learning opportunities that engage students in problem solving,
direct investigation, inquiry and analysis of data. |
Problem-posing and
problem-solving, direct investigation, inquiry, and data analysis are
seamlessly interwoven into the project’s activities. |
A question
to considered pertaining to the above mentioned project GOAL:
1. How can problem-posing and problem-solving, direct investigation, inquiry,
and data analysis
become seamlessly interwoven into the project’s activities?
|
|
|
|
|
Problems and Dilemmas
that Arose in Our Project
Mr. Willie taught the students how to respect the natural borders in nature
by having them build rock borders around garden plots. Students such as LeBron
and Lee, not only learned how to construct and respect borders, but they simultaneously
became stewards of their garden. Later, they would inform visitors and schoolmates
about the importance of staying on the pathway, and off of the garden plots.
This is one of many indicators of how student ownership evolved in their project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|


|
|
Last spring and early summer,
we experienced severe drought conditions. Simultaneously, we were planting seeds,
saplings, and other transplants. The significant amount of succulent growth,
had a significant effect upon our chipmunk population which soon grew as it
fed upon fresh, juicy plants. The students and staff brainstormed on the problem
and decided upon two potential solutions: 1. Find two female cats and provide
them with their shots and have them spayed. 2. Set a live trap where the chipmunks
usually scamper. |
|
|
|
Evaluation
of the Permaculture, Gardening and Xeriscaping Work Theme:
Process
Q: To what stage of development does the work welcome the questions and complications
that arise from the work?
A: The evidence that substantiates a Maturing level includes the following:
- The evidence does indicate
that the students are open to new ideas, questions, and problems.
- Plus, the project included
some open-ended activities.
- Much of the same community
members were involved in the two dilemmas; staff and students.
- Participants have yet
to figure out how to engage with the most contentious issues in an effective
way, i.e., abuse and neglect of the land, and differences of culture.
Community
Learning and Contributions
|
QUESTION
|
Beginning:
Glimmer of a New Approach
|
Progressing
|
Progressing
|
Advanced/GOAL:
Transforming and Sustainable
|
| Does the work welcome
the questions and complications that arise from the work? |
The project introduces
out-of-classroom work in the form of discrete, highly structured learning
activities where little deviation is possible. |
The project includes
some open-ended activities. When the project reaches its conclusion, it
may be repeated with a different group of students connecting with pretty
much the same community people or institutions, with positive, yet predictable
results. If problems or questions arise along the way, they are not given
much attention or they are treated as diversions from the “real”
work. |
The work and its
processes are open to new ideas, questions, and problems, showing a good
degree of flexibility. However, participants have not yet figured out
how to engage with the most contentious issues in an effective way. |
The work has led
to the development or enhancement of a process that welcomes and encourages
questions, multiple answers, and increasing complexity. The work may generate
uncertainty, “mess,” conflict, or chaos, but as the work unfolds,
passion and shared vision eventually guide the group to “aha!”
experiences and positive results. New problems ultimately become resources. |
A question
to considered pertaining to the above mentioned project GOAL:
- How can the work lead
to the development or enhancement of a process that welcomes and encourages
questions, multiple answers, and increasing complexity?
-
If the work generates
uncertainty, “mess,” conflict, or chaos, how can we ensure a
shared vision, “aha!” experiences, and positive results? That
is, how can we transform new problems into resources and solutions that
propel the work forward?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |